Cases 21 - 30 of 34
CEPEDA v. READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2017cv01635
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO CEPEDA
Defendant:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, OFFICER JOHN DOE #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabrera v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jose Emmanuel Ortiz Cabrera
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jane Doe, Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Varano et al
as 1:2014cv01951
Plaintiff:
Paris L. James
Defendant:
David Varano, Kathryn McCarty, Lori Alderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Keri Moore, Mike Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellings v. Sabol et al
as 3:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Snellings
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Clare Doll, Bonno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. Blessing et al
as 1:2011cv00436
Defendant:
D Blessing , Ruth Rush , Herr and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMICKLE v. YEADON BOROUGH POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2010cv07416
Defendant:
YEADON BOROUGH POLICE DEPT., JACQUELINE B. MOSLEY, MOLINEUX and others
Plaintiff:
MATHIS AVERY MCMICKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAXWELL v. NUTTI et al
as 2:2010cv00875
Plaintiff:
TYREEK MAXWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTI, CITY OF PHILA, CITY MANAGING DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
