Cases 31 - 40 of 134
HAYWARD v. BATON et al
as 1:2021cv16375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAYWARD, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER BATON, OFFICER FORREST, NURSE ABBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2021cv14577
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O L. BYRD, SERGEANT PEER and CAPTAIN T. BLANQO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROJAS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv16006
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. ROJAS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TRISH C., MARLEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11360
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, WOODLEY, D'ANDREA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELCH v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv04526
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JANE & jOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, COUNTY EMPLOYEES JANE & JOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10, LIUETENANT R. CLUGSTEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05947
Defendant:
G. SHAFFER, FRANK B. WILLIAMS, C.O. SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
AMIN A. RASHID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv03083
Defendant:
COLONEL WILLIAM SMITH, CAPTAIN T. BLAIR and DR. TAYLOR
Plaintiff:
LORENZO BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
LINDA A. HYNES, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, DEPUTY CT. ADMIN. TASHESIA HICKMOND and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
