Cases 1 - 10 of 167
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickens v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Rashan Mickens
Defendant:
Sharon Clark, Heather Haldeman, A.J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, M QUINN and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
Gina Clark, M. Quinn and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
