Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ESTELA-GOMEZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2015cv06778
Plaintiff:
LUIS FERNANDO ESTELA-GOMEZ, HUGHES ALEXANDER, ORLANDINO DASILVA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CAI v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
DONG CAI
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE), J. CABRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAI v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 3:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
DONG CAI
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fattah v. Mitra, et al
as 12-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDEL FATTAH
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY A. MITRA, Supervisory Detention and Deportation Office for the US Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), MARY SABOL, Warden York County Prison, THOMAS DECKER, Field Office Director, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Philadelphia Field Office and others
Prince Adekoya, II v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 11-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRINCE A.Z.K. ADEKOYA, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, Field Office Director, DHS/ICE New York , New York., R LOPEZ, Deportation Officer, Detention and Removal Operation DHS/ICE New York , New York and others
AKINOLA v. CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2009cv01010
Plaintiff:
KOLE AKINOLA
Defendant:
CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) and CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (USICE)
Respondent:
CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
