Cases 51 - 60 of 140
HAMMOND v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2012cv05796
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RUSSELL HAMMOND
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05165
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05164
Plaintiff:
JULIO A. MENDEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv04314
Plaintiff:
LUIS VASQUEZ
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORREST et al v. SHOATZ et al
as 2:2012cv04128
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST, SHOATZ and INCARCERATED CITIZENS COALITION
Defendant:
SAUERS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv04064
Plaintiff:
KYLE GORE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. DUNLEVY et al
as 2:2012cv03474
Plaintiff:
VAUGH PERKINS
Defendant:
DUNLEVY and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. P.H.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIG v. DUNLEY et al
as 2:2012cv03445
Plaintiff:
DEON EMANUEL CRAIG
Defendant:
DUNLEY and P.H.S. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRIPP v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv02874
Plaintiff:
HERMAN FRIPP
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01271
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , RICHARD , BRUCE BLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
