Cases 1 - 10 of 24
TALBERT v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2015cv03229
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01449
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN V. MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01140
Plaintiff:
RODNEY CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTBROOK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv00633
Plaintiff:
ERIC WESTBROOK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07107
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD BROWN, III
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05986
Plaintiff:
JEROME MILLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05905
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMIL HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, GIORLA, GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv05550
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACOSTA v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2012cv05078
Plaintiff:
FRANK ACOSTA
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
