Cases 41 - 49 of 49
ACOSTA v. HEART II HEART, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01242
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
HEART II HEART, LLC and TONI CHANDLER DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
ACOSTA v. ELITE LINEN, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03476
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ELITE LINEN, LLC and JONATHAN LEVINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AMBULANCE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03454
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AMBULANCE INC., ART OF LIFE, INC., EZ TRANS ENTERPRISE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. NS & GS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05384
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
NS & GS LLC, SEHJOG LLC, S. HARI SINGH MGT INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. SX MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
SX MANAGEMENT, LLC, STEVEN MITNICK and EDMOND MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Alexander's Salon & Spa, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00902
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Alexander's Salon & Spa, Inc., Alexander's in the Woods, LLC and Sherrilyn Tarapchak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. PPS Preservation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
PPS Preservation, Inc. and Nick Potochnick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
ACOSTA v. BARTASH PRINTING, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01446
Defendant:
TROY NGUYEN, BARTASH PRINTING, INC. and VQ MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
STEWART v. GAUDIN
as 2:2015cv01094
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, EUGENE SCALIA, MILTON AL STEWART and others
Defendant:
HOLLAND ACQUISITIONS, INC. a corporation doing business as HOLLAND SERVICES and BRYAN GAUDIN individually, and as a Corporate Officer of HOLLAND ACQUISITIONS, INC., D/B/A HOLLAND SERVICES
Intervenor Defendant:
ROBERT GAUDIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
