Family and Medical Leave Act Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,650
VIDAL-TORO v. IHERB, LLC
as 2:2023cv01524
Petitioner: JOSELLY VIDAL-TORO
Defendant: IHERB, LLC
VIDAL-TORO v. IHERB, LLC
as 5:2023cv01524
Plaintiff: JOSELLY VIDAL-TORO
Defendant: IHERB, LLC
Moreno v. Cardinal Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff: Joe Moreno
Defendant: Cardinal Systems, Inc. and Fox Pools of York, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MONTGOMERY v. MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC.
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MONTGOMERY
Defendant: MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. doing business as RIDDLE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
BALUHA v. MORGAN PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02111
Plaintiff: ANDREW BALUHA
Defendant: MORGAN PROPERTIES, LLC, BRENDA ROBINSON and MORGAN PROPERTIES PAYROLL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
v. HEMMINGWAY et al
as 1:2023cv02089
Defendant: SHERRY HEMMINGWAY, SHAWNTAE HAZEWOOD, DANIEL GUERCI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
ADAMS v. SEDGWICK et al.
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
Defendant: SEDGWICK, SHERRY HEMMINGWAY, SHAWNTAE HAZEWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
BRANSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff: John Branson
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SANTIAGO v. NVR, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02074
Plaintiff: RAFAEL SANTIAGO
Defendant: NVR, INC., NVR BUILDING PRODUCTS and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SMITH v. KUBIK MALTBIE INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff: JAMIE E. SMITH
Defendant: KUBIK MALTBIE INC., ROBERT HENDRICKS and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?