Cases 31 - 40 of 695
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Minor
as 3:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
Chanelle Britt
Defendant:
Tukishia Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MUNIZ v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 5:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MUNIZ
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Torres v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Torres
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
JACKSON et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 2:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JACKSON, NASIR SAMPSON and YOULANDA BOLDER
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SMITH, II v. NOFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
JAY H. SMITH, II
Defendant:
NOFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION doing business as NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970
JENKINS v. PETSMART, LLC
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
TAMAYAH JENKINS
Defendant:
PETSMART and PETSMART, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LEGGETT v. WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LEGGETT
Defendant:
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
BATES v. EMPYREAN SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BATES
Defendant:
EMPYREAN SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
FREDERICK v. ACOSTA SALES CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
LEROY FREDERICK
Defendant:
ACOSTA SALES CO., INC. and MOSAIC SALES SOLUTIONS US OPERATING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SHANNON v. HIGHMARK HEALTH
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
SHEENA V. SHANNON
Defendant:
HIGHMARK HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
