Cases 1 - 10 of 588
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. NOMIDES et al
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, DANIEL R. WILLIAMS and I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE I.U.P.A.T. WELFARE FUND OF WESTERN PA AND THE I.U.P.A.T. WESTERN PA ANNUITY FUND AND
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. NOMIDES i/a/t/d/b/a CRT Enterprises and THOMAS NOMIDES i/a/t/d/b/a CRT ENTERPRISES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. KRISTAKIS DECORATING & WALLCOVERING CO., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, DANIEL R. WILLIAMS and I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS
Defendant:
KRISTAKIS DECORATING & WALLCOVERING, CO., INC. and MICHAEL KRISTAKIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE et al v. KEYSTONE TILE AND MARBLE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE, TRUSTEES OF BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE JOINT APPRENTICE AND TRAINING FUND, TRUSTEES OF BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant:
KEYSTONE TILE AND MARBLE, INC. and LYDELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marla Knudsen, et al v. MetLife Group Inc
as 23-2420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLA KNUDSEN and WILLIAM DUTRA, as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the MetLife Options & Choices Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
METLIFE GROUP INC
Keith Krutchten, et al v. Ricoh USA, Inc, et al
as 23-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH K. KRUTCHTEN, ANGEL D. MURATALLA and WILLIAM BEGANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
RICOH USA, INC, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RICOH USA INC, RICOH RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE and others
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1868
Appellee:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH, CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLS and T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP
Defendant:
GREGORY FIELDS and MC DUPONT CLARK EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST
Not Classified By Court:
MICHAEL DUPONT
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1869
Appellant:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH, CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MILLS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP and FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC
Defendant:
GREGORY FIELDS and MC DUPONT CLARK EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST
Not Classified By Court:
MICHAEL DUPONT
Lucy Dunne, et al v. Elton Corp, et al
as 23-1546
Appellee:
LUCY DUNNE, representative for Helena duPont Wright, JAMES B. WYETH, solely as executor and personal representative of the estate of Phyllis M. Wyeth, MARY MILLS ABEL-SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MILLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
T. KIMBERLY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
ELTON CORP, GREGORY FIELDS, FIRST REPUBLIC TRUST CO OF DELAWARE LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
