Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Rakofski v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2019cv01819
Defendant: Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company, COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, MetLife and others
Plaintiff: Amber Rakofski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
RAKOFSKY v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv19146
Defendant: METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE CO., COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Plaintiff: AMBER RAKOFSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401K RETIREMENT PLAN v. PHOENIX ELEVATOR SERVICE, INC. OF GEORGIA et al
as 2:2016cv04391
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401K RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: PHOENIX ELEVATOR SERVICE, INC. OF GEORGIA and AMBER MULLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
GARLAND et al v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00179
Plaintiff: AMBER GARLAND and ESTATE OF MARY J. URQUIZA
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?