Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PINK ORCHID FASHIONS LTD. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2021cv10227
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, NGUYEN VAN DUNG, JOHN DOES 2 TO 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Pink Orchid Fashion Ltd. and PINK ORCHID FASHIONS LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
THE HOMESOURCE, CORP. v. RETAILER WEB SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2018cv11970
Defendant:
RETAILER WEB SERVICES, LLC, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
THE HOMESOURCE, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. v. ENIGMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04675
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ENIGMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. doing business as WESTERN and others
Plaintiff:
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CLARION BRANDS, LLC v. LLORENS PHARMACEUTICAL INTERNATIONAL DIVISION, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06592
Plaintiff:
CLARION BRANDS, LLC
Defendant:
LLORENS PHARMACEUTICAL INTERNATIONAL DIVISION, INC. , LLORENS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC v. DARLING et al
as 2:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
ATRIUM COMPANIES, INC
Defendant:
CHRIS DARLING, DARLING SEO, LLC, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Square Ring Inc. v. Doe-1 et al
as 1:2009cv00563
Defendant:
Ustream.TV Inc., John Does 4-10, Ustream and others
Plaintiff:
Square Ring Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
LONSTEIN LAW OFFICE, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Cable System Piracy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
