Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Waterman v. PRGX Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Kevin F. Costello, Gregory J. Owens, PRGX Global, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Ciccotelli v. PRGX Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Kevin F. Costello, Gregory J. Owens, PRGX Global, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Rosenblatt v. Jernigan Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01141
Defendant:
NexPoint Re Merger, Inc., Jernigan Capital, Inc., Howard A. Silver and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Starosciak v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01315
Defendant:
W. Steve Albrecht, Hassane El-Khoury, Catherine P. Lego and others
Plaintiff:
Artur Starosciak
HATT v. CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv15400
Plaintiff:
JEAN-DENIS HATT
Defendant:
HASSANE EL-KHOURY, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, CATHERINE P. LEGO and others
Wheby v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01267
Defendant:
W. Steve Albrecht, Hassane El-Khoury, Jeannine Sargent and others
Plaintiff:
Earl M. Wheby, Jr.
ISM CONNECT INVESTMENT GROUP LLC v. ISM CONNECT, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01055
Plaintiff:
ISM CONNECT INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
Defendant:
ISM CONNECT, LLC, MAURICE J. GALLAGHER, JR., GALLAGHER FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SULLIVAN v. ARCONIC INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
JANET L. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC., KLAUS KLEINFELD, ROBERT S. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Gordon v. Kite Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01281
Plaintiff:
Simon Gordon
Defendant:
Kite Pharma, Inc., Arie S. Belldegrun, David Bonderman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CLANCY et al v. BLACKROCK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC. et al
as 3:2015cv01403
Plaintiff:
OWEN CLANCY , JACK HORNSTEIN , BRENDAN FOOTE and others
Defendant:
BLACKROCK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC and BLACKROCK ADVISORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
