Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Floyd v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, Richard P. Dealy and others
KENT v. VALDES et al
as 2:2023cv20475
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
HECTOR VALDES, BLUWATER HOLDINGS CORP., DOGGTEK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Wilhelm v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Steven J. Shapiro, Maire A. Baldwin and others
WATERMAN v. VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC., MAXIM C. W. WEBB, DOROTHY A TAMIAN-PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Wilhelm v. Vidler Water Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Vidler Water Resources, Inc., Maxim C.W. Webb, Dorothy Timian-Palmer and others
FREDRICKS v. CONSOL COAL RESOURCES, L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Plaintiff:
JOHN FREDRICKS
Defendant:
CONSOL COAL RESOURCES, L.P., JAMES A. BROCK, MARTHA A. WIEGAND and others
JACOBOWITZ v. RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
MARK S. SCUCCHI, ROGER S. MANNY, JEFFREY L. VENTURA and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JACOBOWITZ
Andescavage v. QEP Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
QEP Resources, Inc., Michael J. Minarovic, Barth E. Whitham and others
Plaintiff:
John Andescavage
Ciccotelli v. CONSOL Coal Resources LP et al
as 1:2020cv01664
Defendant:
Michael L. Greenwood, Jeffrey L. Wallace, Kurt R. Salvatori and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Horde v. Parsley Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01642
Defendant:
A.R. Alameddine, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, Pearl Merger Sub Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Horde
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
