Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 9,572
J.C. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv21028
Plaintiff: J.C.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Langilotti v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01633
Plaintiff: Maureen P. Langilotti
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bazewicz v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01712
Plaintiff: Marlena M. Bazewicz
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DARING v. SOCIAL SECURITY SSDI
as 2:2023cv04357
Plaintiff: STEVEN DARING
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY SSDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FRAZIER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04226
Plaintiff: DONALD FRAZIER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILCOX v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv01823
Plaintiff: DANIELLE MARIE WILCOX
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv22342
Plaintiff: GINA GRANT
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCTIGHE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv22121
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS MCTIGHE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NATTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22456
Plaintiff: JACLYN A. NATTER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAMUELS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv20780
Plaintiff: CLINTON LEO SAMUELS, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?