Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,599
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01684
Plaintiff: TRAYVONE TYRELL BOYD
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DEJESUS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05290
Plaintiff: MARIA DEJESUS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
MANFREADY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05228
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY ELIZABETH MANFREADY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff: JOHN HAM
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01562
Plaintiff: Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heck v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Ms. Melanie Heck
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01568
Plaintiff: Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MITCHELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01520
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MITCHELL
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: Sebastian Dayton Walker
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
CHATHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: CARRIE ANN CHATHAM
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?