Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Williams Development & Construction, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Williams Development & Construction, Inc. , Craig Williams , Lee Williams and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
DeZan et al v. United States of America
as 1:2018mc00053
Petitioner:
Armando DeZan and Arel Group Wine & Spirits, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
WOODWARD et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv03991
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WOODWARD and KATHLEEN WOODWARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
G2A.COM Sp. z o.o. (Ltd.) v. United States of America
as 1:2017mc00177
Petitioner:
G2A.COM Sp. z o.o. (Ltd.)
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00322
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00304
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITES STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01082
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00942
Petitioner:
CHRONIC DISEASE FUND, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Gandrup v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015mc00287
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Gandrup v. United State of America, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00038
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United State of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
