Cases 91 - 100 of 490
Mazepa v. Discover Card Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02435
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Discover Card Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mazepa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRONG v. SPACE COAST MARKETING, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05510
Defendant:
SPACE COAST MARKETING, LLC, JASON LESTER BELT, DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
BOWER V NRA GROUP, LLC, ET AL
as 1:2018cv00389
Defendant:
DOES 1-5 and NRA GROUP, LLC.
Plaintiff:
ELEN BOWER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
N'JAI v. BERRYHILL et al
as 2:2018cv01616
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MONROEVILLE OFFICE, MRS. SIMONS, SIMMS, OR JANE DOE, NANCY A. BERRYHILL and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN N'JAI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PERRONG v. OX CAR CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05027
Defendant:
GIAVONNA HUNT, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, OX CAR CARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
BAILEY v. CONTRACT CALLERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04867
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and CONTRACT CALLERS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAILEY v. CONTRACT CALLERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04773
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and CONTRACT CALLERS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRONG v. MS INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES "MSIE" et al
as 2:2018cv04760
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
KASHAN CHARLES RILEY, MS INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES "MSIE", JANE DARLENE RILEY and others
Fumosa v. Sallie Mae et al
as 3:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
Lucy Fumosa
Defendant:
Sallie Mae and DOES 1 - 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
ROBERT CARR INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. CAREER ADVANTAGE OF MAHONING VALLEY, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01393
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-12, CAREER ADVANTAGE OF MAHONING VALLEY, INC., CAREER ADVANTAGE INC. OF LAWRENCE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARR INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
