Cases 121 - 130 of 200
GRILL v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. GRILL
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BARR v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2016cv01455
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL BARR
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEIST v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC et al
as 2:2016cv01225
Plaintiff:
SUSAN FEIST
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WHITE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06679
Plaintiff:
DONNA WHITE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KOENIG v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06345
Plaintiff:
ROSEANN P. KOENIG
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LUKE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06050
Plaintiff:
IRA LUKE, JR.
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, LLP and FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FUENTES v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv05661
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FUENTES
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ZIMRI v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv05402
Plaintiff:
ALLISON ZIMRI
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NAVIAS ET AL V. MIDLANDN CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv05401
Plaintiff:
LOUIS NAVIAS and ARLENE NAVIAS
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KAHN v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv05968
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE KAHN
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
