Cases 31 - 40 of 49
BAMBLING v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C. et al
as 3:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA BAMBLING
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C. and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSS v. TRANS UNION LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03571
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. ROSS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BAUER v. CACH, LLC. et al
as 2:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. BAUER
Defendant:
CACH, LLC. and HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nasser Limousine, LLC v. Feel Good Limo, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02386
Plaintiff:
Nasser Limousine, LLC
Defendant:
Feel Good Limo, Inc., Frank Ross and Karen Ross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ROSS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05166
Plaintiff:
NAFISA ROSS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hodorawis v. Harrison Ross Byck, Esq.,P.C.
as 3:2010cv01944
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hodorawis
Defendant:
Harrison Ross Byck, Esq.,P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RICHARDS v. SQUARETWO FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv03408
Plaintiff:
JANINE RICHARDS
Defendant:
SQUARETWO FINANCIAL CORPORATION and HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THOMPSON v. ROSS et al
as 2:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
PETER W. THOMPSON
Defendant:
KENNETH M. ROSS, TIMOTHY P. MILLER, MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRISS et al v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv06508
Plaintiff:
BARRY CRISS and MARY LOU CRISS
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., ANTHONY DEMARCO, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DAWSON v. HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQUIRE, P.C.
as 2:2009cv05426
Plaintiff:
LINDA DAWSON
Defendant:
HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQUIRE, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
