Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
ALLENTOWN SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Lower Saucon Township et al
as 5:2024cv02350
Plaintiff: ALLENTOWN SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant: Lower Saucon Township, Lower Saucon Township Council and The Lower Saucon Township Zoning Hearing Board
Northeast Pennsylvania SMSA Limited Partnership v. Plymouth Borough et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff: Northeast Pennsylvania SMSA Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Defendant: Plymouth Borough and The Plymouth Borough Zoning Hearing Board
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE et al
as 3:2023cv23072
Plaintiff: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant: THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE and THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant: Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY et al
as 1:2023cv04370
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant: THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY, THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OCEAN CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
DINAPOLI v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03013
Plaintiff: ANTHONY DINAPOLI
Defendant: TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01623
Plaintiff: JOCELYN JOHNSON
Defendant: TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cellco Partnership v. White Deer Township Zoning Hearing Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2392
Plaintiff / Appellee: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant / Appellant: WHITE DEER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04531
Plaintiff: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Defendant: THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY and ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDING, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
MEHANOVIC v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00945
Plaintiff: CAZIM MEHANOVIC
Defendant: TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?