Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State of Delaware v. BP America Inc, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA INC, BP PLC, CHEVRON CORP and others
Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, PUBLIC CITIZEN INC and others
State of NJ Dept of Env Protec v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 11-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION and BOB MARTIN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, THOMAS TICKNER, Commander, USACOE, North Atlantic Division, Philadelphia District, in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PHILA REGIONAL PORT
State of NJ Dept of Env Protec v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 11-1424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 3:2009cv05889
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER, DELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
MORGAN ADVANCED CERAMICS, INC. v. SAYRE et al
as 2:2007cv04761
Plaintiff:
MORGAN ADVANCED CERAMICS, INC.
Defendant:
AUSTIN B. SAYRE, JR., F. STUART SAYRE, PETER ROZEMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
