Cases 11 - 18 of 18
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC v. DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
as 2:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LANDAN et al v. WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST et al
as 2:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
LINDA LANDAN , HOLLY AND LINDSAY, LLC , JEFFREY J. SIKIRICA and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST , WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , WAL-MART STORES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. SWEET DREAM INN INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04565
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
SWEET DREAM INN INC., DUKE B. YOON and YOUNG S. YOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY ANGELINI, INC. v. SEC BESD SOLAR ONE, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv01093
Plaintiff:
Ray Angelini, Inc.
Defendant:
SEC BESD Solar One, LLC , SEC Bellefonte SD Solar One, LLC , Duke Energy Generation Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY ANGELINI, INC. v. SEC BESD SOLAR ONE, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02678
Plaintiff:
RAY ANGELINI, INC.
Defendant:
SEC BESD SOLAR ONE, LLC , SEC BELLEFONTE SD SOLAR ONE, LLC , DUKE ENERGY GENERATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. ROSALIND KASKA & ASSOC., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04402
Plaintiff:
SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
ROSALIND KASKA & ASSOC., INC. and DUKE DIAGNOSTIC RESALE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duke Advantage LLC v. Cormatrix Cardiovascular Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00587
Plaintiff:
Duke Advantage LLC
Defendant:
Cormatrix Cardiovascular Inc., Robert G. Matheny, David Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
