Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Susan Dougherty, et al v. Roger Carr, et al
as 10-1527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN DOUGHERTY and STEWARD INTERNATIONAL ENHANCED INDEX FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER CARR, TODD STITZER, ANDREW R.J. BONFIELD and others
CARR et al v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (U.S.A.), N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
ROSE CARR and ROBIN DEAVER
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (U.S.A.), N.A. and CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DOUGHERTY v. CARR et al
as 2:2009cv06406
Plaintiff:
SUSAN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
ROGER CARR, TODD STITZER, ANDREW BONFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
STEWARD INTERNATIONAL ENHANCED INDEX FUND v. CARR et al
as 2:2009cv05006
Plaintiff:
STEWARD INTERNATIONAL ENHANCED INDEX FUND
Defendant:
ROGER CARR, TODD STITZER, ANDREW R.J. BONFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
LEE v. CARR et al
as 3:2009cv04729
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE and CHARLES LEE
Defendant:
ROBERT O. CARR, ROBERT H.B. BALDWIN, MITCHELL L. HOLLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MIELE v. CARR et al
as 3:2009cv04687
Plaintiff:
PAUL MIELE and PAUL MIELE
Defendant:
ROBERT O. CARR, ROBERT H.B. BALDWIN, MITCHELL L. HOLLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
CARR v. NJ CURE INSURANCE CO.
as 3:2009cv03760
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CARR
Defendant:
NJ CURE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CARR v. BROADBAND ENERGY NETWORKS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01345
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL CARR
Defendant:
BROADBAND ENERGY NETWORKS, INC. and LAWRENCE SILVERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARR v. NJ CURE INSURANCE CO.
as 3:2008cv00692
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CARR
Defendant:
NJ CURE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
