Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CEDAR GROVE TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv09761
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC., ABC CORPS. 1-10 (fictitious entities), and others
Plaintiff:
CEDAR GROVE TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GLOBAL CONCENTRATE, INC.
as 2:2017cv11641
Plaintiff:
BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
GLOBAL CONCENTRATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC v. HAYES
as 2:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC
Defendant:
BAXTER MCLINDON HAYES, JR. and UTILPATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
BAXTER MCLINDON HAYES, JR. and UTILPATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. NW SIGN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2015cv08193
Plaintiff:
BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
NW SIGN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Litwin v. Human Genome Sciences Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
Joan Litwin
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences Inc., H. Thomas Watkings, Argeris N. Karabelas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. APEX CAPITAL, LP et al
as 2:2010cv01634
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
APEX CAPITAL, LP, ADVANCE BUSINESS CAPITAL, BULL TRANZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
BAXTER v. GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv05050
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BAXTER
Defendant:
GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
