Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Outcome Capital, LLC v. Elios Vision, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Outcome Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Elios Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ODELL v. U.S. VISION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv06753
Plaintiff:
Bonita Odell
Defendant:
U.S. VISION, INC., USV OPTICAL, INC. and Nationwide Optometry, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Corporate Visions, Inc. v. Cision US, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Corporate Visions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cision US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SUSQUEHANNA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC. v. PALM BEACH LASER EYE INSTITUTE - WELLINGTON, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04288
Plaintiff:
SUSQUEHANNA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC.
Defendant:
PALM BEACH LASER EYE INSTITUTE - WELLINGTON, LLC, SALVATORE M. DECANIO, JR. and LIFESTYLE OF VISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. BIG VISION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05266
Plaintiff:
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
Defendant:
BIG VISION, INC., BIG VISION STUDIOS, LLC and LORINE RAYCRAFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PARTNERS IN VISION, INC. et al v. VOGT et al
as 2:2009cv02110
Plaintiff:
PARTNERS IN VISION, INC. and VIP OPITCAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
SHARON M. VOGT, GLENN MOYER and CAREFREE OPTICAL AND CENTER FOR CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
OHIO VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL v. RIOUX VISION, INC.
as 2:2007cv01452
Plaintiff:
OHIO VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL
Defendant:
RIOUX VISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
U.S. VISION, INC. v. CHIONG et al
as 1:2007cv04979
Plaintiff:
U.S. VISION, INC.
Defendant:
DESMOND CHUNG SENG CHIONG and RODERICK JOHN SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
