Cases 41 - 50 of 142
CONTALDI et al v. SCHMIDT et al
as 2:2017cv13508
Plaintiff:
WALTER CONTALDI and ENDO RAZORS, LLC
Defendant:
KEVIN SCHMIDT, CODY SCHMIDT, SPEED RAZOR LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
EBIN NEW YORK, INC. v. LEE et al
as 2:2017cv13509
Plaintiff:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Defendant:
YOUNG CHUL LEE, KYUNG HO KANG, SM BEAUTY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mesora Pharma, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01805
Plaintiff:
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Mesora Pharma, LLC, Pyramid Management, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NY MACHINERY INC. et al v. THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY et al
as 2:2017cv12269
Plaintiff:
NY MACHINERY INC. and KLEANERS LLC
Defendant:
THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY , JOHN CHUNG and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
FISH KISS LLC v. NORTH STAR CREATIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08193
Plaintiff:
FISH KISS LLC
Defendant:
NORTH STAR CREATIONS, LLC , ROOTED MADE , ROOTEDUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ANGER SPORTS, LLC v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2017cv08015
Defendant:
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY , ARIN BLAZEK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ANGER SPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
VENICE PI, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
VENICE PI, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HEADHUNTER, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv02985
Plaintiff:
HEADHUNTER, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PHYSICIANS RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS, LLC v. LUNOVUS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01935
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIANS RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS, LLC
Defendant:
LUNOVUS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
