Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 140
BATINKOFF v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv16388
Defendant: CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. and MARK H. KRESS
Plaintiff: RANDALL BATINKOFF
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Apicore US LLC
as 1:2018cv01034
Defendant: Apicore US LLC
Plaintiff: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, H. Lundbeck A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited et al
as 1:2018cv00853
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant: MSN Laboratories Private Limited , MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MSN Pharmachem Private Limited
Counter_claimant: MSN Pharmachem Private Limited , MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MSN Laboratories Private Limited
Counter_defendant: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Lupin Limited et al
as 1:2018cv00777
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant: Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Lupin Limited
Counter_defendant: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Cipla Limited et al
as 1:2018cv00753
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant: Cipla Limited and Cipla USA Inc.
Counter_claimant: Cipla Limited and Cipla USA Inc.
Counter_defendant: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. et al v. Perrigo Company et al
as 1:2018cv00703
Plaintiff: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and MiCal Pharmaceuticals LLC - H Series
Defendant: Perrigo Company , Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Limited and Perrigo New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. LUNDBECK A/S et al v. SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC
as 2:2018cv01880
Plaintiff: H. LUNDBECK A/S , TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD. , TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. and others
Defendant: SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al
as 1:2018cv00672
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant: Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited and Torrent Pharma Inc.
Counter_claimant: Torrent Pharma Inc. and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited
Counter_defendant: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
H. Lundbeck A/S et al v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
as 1:2018cv00671
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant: Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
Counter_claimant: Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
Counter_defendant: H. Lundbeck A/S , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HOLBROOK v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00539
Defendant: URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY OF PITTSBURG, MOSITES MOTORSPORTS, URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: K H DESIGN LLC, MLK MURAL and KYLE HOLBROOK
3Rd Party Plaintiff: MISTICK CONSTRUCTION CO.
3Rd Party Defendant: MCCORMACK BARON SALAZAR DEVELOPMENT, INC. and JADELL MINNIEFIELD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?