Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ART DISTRIBUTION INC. et al v. ARIEL IMPEX LP et al
as 2:2017cv05592
Plaintiff:
ART DISTRIBUTION INC. and KOMANDA LLC
Defendant:
ARIEL IMPEX LP, PINEBROOK IMPEX LP and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
v. ARIEL IMPEX LP et al
as 1:2017cv05590
Defendant:
ARIEL IMPEX LP, PINEBROOK IMPEX LP and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. UEP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01340
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
UEP, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
BLUEWIRE MEDIA, LLC et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2013cv03667
Plaintiff:
BLUEWIRE MEDIA, LLC and STEVEN ACITO
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, GOP VICTORY 2011, MARK CIMINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. MARCUM et al
as 2:2012cv00776
Defendant:
GREG MARCUM, STACEY MARCUM and JOHN DOES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. SCS COLLECTIBLES, INC et al
as 2:2012cv00777
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
SCS COLLECTIBLES, INC and JOHN DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. CULWELL et al
as 2:2012cv00778
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
CLINT CULWELL and JOHN DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. COLLINS et al
as 2:2012cv00774
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS and JOHN DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC v. MAILLET et al
as 2:2012cv00775
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MAILLET and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
