Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KOREAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE U.S.A, LLC et al v. OVERSEAS KOREAN FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2015cv06813
Plaintiff:
KOREAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE U.S.A, LLC , RICHARD C. CHO and ROSEMARY C. SUL
Defendant:
OVERSEAS KOREAN FOUNDATION and KYU-HYUNG CHO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Richard Ackourey, Jr. v. Sonellas Custom Tailors, et al
as 13-3818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR., d/b/a GRAPHIC STYLES/STYLES INTERNATIONAL LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
SONELLAS CUSTOM TAILORS, a/k/a HONG KONG TAILORS (USA) and DILEEP KUMAR DASWANI, a/k/a KEN DASWANI
ACKOUREY v. KESWANI'S CREATIONS et al
as 2:2012cv01993
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
KESWANI'S CREATIONS and KENNY KESWANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ACKOUREY v. ROCHEES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01763
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
ROCHEES, INC., SUNDER DASWANI and KISHORE DASWANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Duffy et al v. The Large Art Company et al
as 1:2011cv01871
Plaintiff:
William F. Duffy , Richard C. Angino and Alice K. Angino
Defendant:
The Large Art Company, Richard Rist and Karen Rist
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ACKOUREY v. LA RUKICO CUSTOM TAILOR et al
as 2:2011cv02401
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
LA RUKICO CUSTOM TAILOR and KAMAL RAMCHANDANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ACKOUREY v. MANJU'S, INC. ET AL
as 2:2010cv05170
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
MANJU'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ACKOUREY v. MOHAN'S CUSTOM TAILORS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05454
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
MOHAN'S CUSTOM TAILORS, INC. and MIKE RAMCHANDANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ACKOUREY v. BHAMBI'S CUSTOM TAILORS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02940
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
BHAMBI'S CUSTOM TAILORS, INC., LAL SADHWANI and HARRY BHAMBI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
