Cases 11 - 20 of 6,363
HANEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06502
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERT HANEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GONZALEZ GONZALEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GONZALEZ GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bolich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Edward Bolich
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
FRANITTI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES FRANITTI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CARLISLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
HARRY J. CARLISLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ALEMEIDA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04276
Plaintiff:
ANAPAULA M. ALEMEIDA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04307
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
NARCISSO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06356
Plaintiff:
RUTH D NARCISSO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06370
Plaintiff:
SHIRLA WOODS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
SACKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SACKS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
