Cases 21 - 30 of 6,363
BANKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA BANKS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
DAI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE DAI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHORTLIDGE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06334
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN E SHORTLIDGE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SPOSARO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JUSTIN SPOSARO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tricia S. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04556
Plaintiff:
RATYEEMAH WARD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04616
Plaintiff:
MARK HIGGINBOTHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MORGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06277
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MORGAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Karen Louise Jackson
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Rashida Coleman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
