Cases 1 - 10 of 327
WOODALL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
John Edward Woodall
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FATUZZO II v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06239
Plaintiff:
JOHN FATUZZO II
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IANNIELLO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv07355
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT IANNIELLO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHARPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
WESLEY JOHN SHARPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOOPER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOHN HOOPER
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARBERIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. BARBERIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CORTESE, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and US SSA USAO NOTICE ONLY PARTY TO ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Casey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv04851
Plaintiff:
John Casey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
