Cases 91 - 100 of 853
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03718
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SMITH
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DEARRY et al v. SOAREN MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02548
Defendant:
JOSHUA BICKERSTAFF, ANDREW DUNN, FACTORTRUST, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PENNY GREEN and IDELL DEARRY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00802
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Day v. APEX ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02940
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and APEX ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
Plaintiff:
Rikaida Day
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jamison v. LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv01930
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.P. and LTD ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shawneay Jamison
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00707
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BAGBY v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01885
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHANIECE BAGBY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AVELLA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC, et al
as 2:2021cv00534
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, JUUL LABS, INC,, ADAM BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
AVELLA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
