Cases 11 - 20 of 3,262
MICHAELSON v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05722
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAELSON
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MOSCATO et al v. LOPINTO et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Defendant:
ROBERT MOSCATO, ROBERT WILKOS and ESQUIRE RONALD J. CAPPUCCIO
Plaintiff:
LORI MOSCATO, SWOF VENTURES, LP., MICHAEL ROLLA and others
Other:
JOSEPH LOPINTO
Cross Defendant:
LAREN PISCIOTTI, JOSEPH GORRERA, QUANTUM & CO. STRATEGIC ADVISORS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diamond et al v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 2:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
H. JOSHUA DIAMOND, ROBERT P. ELSON and LORI ZINN
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Robert Hunter Biden
as 24-1703
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Smith v. NuStar Energy L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
NuStar Energy L.P., Bradley Barron, J. Dan Bates and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Debra AbeytaIn re: Debra Abeyta
as 24-1609
Petitioner:
In re: DEBRA ABEYTA
Not Yet Classified:
ZAHID N. QURAISHI, ALAN COSNER and REBECCA HAND
Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLER
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
