Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Iris Bishop v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-3980
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Defendant:
UPMC HAMOT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRIS BISHOP, Administratrix of the Estate of MICHAEL ANTHONY BISHOP
Iris Bishop v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-3981
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Defendant:
UPMC HAMOT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRIS BISHOP, Administratrix of the Estate of MICHAEL ANTHONY BISHOP
Iris Bishop v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-1619
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, UPMC HAMOT and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRIS BISHOP, Administratrix of the Estate of MICHAEL ANTHONY BISHOP
LR Trust v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Mark J. Alles, Michael W. Bonney, Michael A. Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Rowinski v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
Mark J. Alles, Michael W. Bonney, Michael A. Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Rowinski
Grayson v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Mark J. Alles, Michael W. Bonney, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bette Grayson
SHUBERT v. OBETZ et al
as 2:2019mc00016
Defendant:
MICHELE K. KLUSEWITZ, 149 DOE RUN ROAD, LP, JW BISHOP PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE C. SHUBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Sbriglio v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Mark J. Alles, Michael W. Bonney, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Sbriglio
WANG v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv04865
Defendant:
MARK J. ALLES, MICHAEL W. BONNEY, JOHN H WEILAND and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE WANG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
