Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No. PA WA HL-004.5, et al
as 19-1613
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES M. BUCHANAN AND DIANE ZACK BUCHANAN FARM #4 LP, and, PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO, c/o Corporation Service Company, GRETCHEN RHEINLANDER, husband and wife and others
Defendant:
FRED C. STROUD, BARBARA MINGES SHEPERD, PNC MORTGAGE, a division of PNC Bank, Nation Association and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Bushansky v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Adler v. Alon USA Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00742
Defendant:
Alon USA Energy, Inc., Ilan Cohen, Avigal Soreq and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Page v. Alon USA Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00671
Defendant:
Avigal Soreq, Ilan Cohen, Assaf Binzburg and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Page
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA , SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
Alan S. Armstrong , Frank T. Macinnis , Joseph R. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Garnet Smith
as 13-4608
Not Party - Petitioner:
In re: GARNET D. SMITH
Not Party - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Kenneth Smith
as 12-2216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH D. SMITH, a/k/a McKinley Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
