Cases 11 - 20 of 60
STATISTICAL ZERO GROUP LLC v. MARRERO et al
as 2:2020cv07030
Defendant:
REBEL ONE, INC., JOHN/JANE DOES 1-25 and SERGIO MARRERO
Plaintiff:
STATISTICAL ZERO GROUP LLC
Robert Gene RegaIn re: Robert Gene Rega
as 20-1377
Respondent:
GRIM, WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE, FNU VANDIVNER and others
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
PEOPLE #1 v. EDUCATION, MEDIA, PHARMACEUTICALS et al
as 2:2019cv18517
Defendant:
EDUCATION, MEDIA, PHARMACEUTICALS, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-9, SOCIAL SERVICES, JAILS, HOSPITALS and others
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE #1
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
JOHNNY KARP INVESTMENTS, LLC v. KYRIAKOULIS et al
as 2:2019cv16644
Defendant:
VII CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, VII CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, VII CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY KARP INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIDUCCI et al v. GARCIA et al
as 3:2018cv10879
Defendant:
NELSON GARCIA, DAVID J. AUBEL, ANGEL INVESTMENT PARTNERS GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL FIDUCCI and ESTATE OF RITA PUCCI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KERWIN v. PARX CASINO et al
as 5:2017cv05582
Plaintiff:
RYAN KERWIN
Defendant:
PARX CASINO , GREENWOOD GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT LLC , HELMUT PERZI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LUPOLOVER v. DOCU ZOOM, INC.
as 3:2017cv11953
Plaintiff:
MARK LUPOLOVER
Defendant:
DOCU ZOOM, INC., JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
TUNIT v. Legalzoom.com et al
as 3:2017cv07133
Plaintiff:
GILAT TUNIT
Defendant:
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., THE LEGAL HELPLINE, JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
WELLS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
NATALIE B. WELLS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, MICHAEL SAUDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
