Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
In re: Dana Wiley
as 13-4029
Petitioner: In re: DANA W. WILEY
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Lynn Van Tassel v. John Hodge, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3256
Plaintiff - Appellant: LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Defendant - Appellee: HONORABLE JOHN W. HODGE, Judge, Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, in his official and individual capacities, HONORABLE THOMAS M. PICCIONE, Judge Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, in his official and individual capacities, LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTIONS and others
In re: Jason Scott
as 13-2930
Petitioner: In re: JASON L. SCOTT
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
VAN TASSEL v. HODGE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00024
Plaintiff: LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Defendant: JOHN W. HODGE , THOMAS M. PICCIONE , LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: Dana Wiley
as 12-4158
Petitioner: In re: DANA W. WILEY
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
In re: Randall Chumley v. Frederick Frank, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner: In re: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent: FREDERICK FRANK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
WHITTAKER, et al v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv01092
Plaintiff: THOMAS R. WHITTAKER and CHRISTY L. WHITTAKER
Defendant: COUNTY OF LAWRENCE , TOWNSHIP OF NESHANNOCK , LAWRENCE COUNTY ECOMOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Consol_defendant: DENNIS F. ALDUK , JOSEPH CAMINITI , STEVE J. CRAIG and others
Consol_plaintiff: EDNA J. HAMILTON, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID C. HAMILTON
Mediator: DONALD E. ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?