Cases 11 - 20 of 434
Jane Doe v. Redeemer Health, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant / Appellant:
REDEEMER HEALTH and HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEMS
John Bernard, et al v. BNY Mellon
as 23-8044
Petitioner:
JOHN BERNARD, WILLIAM BERNARD and PAMELA MARTIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
BNY MELLON, N.A.
S/M MERGER ARBITRAGE, L.P. v. EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al
as 2:2023cv20898
Plaintiff:
S/M MERGER ARBITRAGE, L.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and S/M MERGER ARBITRAGE, L.P.
Defendant:
EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,, MARK H. RACHESKY, MICHAEL WEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jane Doe v. Centerville Clinics Inc
as 23-2738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTERVILLE CLINICS INC
Adrian Bombin, et al v. Southwest Airlines Co
as 23-8040
Petitioner:
ADRIAN BOMBIN and SAMANTHA ROOD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
Leon Drummond, et al v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co, et al
as 23-8035
Respondent:
LEON DRUMMOND, LEE WILLIAMS, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and YESHONDA DRIGGINS
Petitioner:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO and PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE CO
In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer
as 23-2377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE M. BERMUDEZ, NICHOLAS TODD HEINRICH and LYNNE KRAUSE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Plaintiff:
DMITRII MUDRECHENKO
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC, MEDIA INNOVATION GROUP LLC, WPP PLC and others
ALEXIA DAHMES v. FIRMENICH SA et al
as 2:2023cv03547
Plaintiff:
ALEXIA DAHMES individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as ALEXIA VIOLA NAPA VALLEY
Defendant:
FIRMENICH SA, FIRMENICH INCORPORATED, AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: FRAGRANCE INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
CHAUTAUQUA SOAP COMPANY and ALEXIA DAHMES individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as ALEXIA VIOLA NAPA VALLEY
Defendant:
GIVAUDAN S.A., GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION, GIVAUDAN FLAVORS CORPORATION and others
In Re:
FRAGRANCE INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Johnathon Mohr v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
as 23-1924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHNATHON MOHR, for himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
