Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 316
BOYTSOVA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv02217
Plaintiff: VALENTINA BOYTSOVA, ILYA BOYTSOVA and ILYA BOYTSOV
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Robinson-Simms v. Best Deal Auto Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00518
Plaintiff: Abdus-Samad Hakim Robinson-Simms
Defendant: Best Deal Auto Sales, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. ROBINSON
as 8:2023cv01847
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
ROBINSON v. ROBINSON ACKERSON
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff: ALBERT THEODORE ROBINSON
Defendant: SHERI LYNN CORNISH ROBINSON ACKERSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert DentIn re: Robert Dent
as 22-3434
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent: TIMOTHY MORRIS, Police Officer, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS, Reading Police Officer and others
USA v. Laquon Robinson
as 22-3414
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LAQUON TERRANCE ROBINSON
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-3120
Petitioner / Appellant: MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plumley v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff: Patrick Plumley
Defendant: Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Susan B. Washer, William Aliski and others
USA v. Raffael Robinson
as 22-2795
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RAFFAEL ROBINSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?