Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Evelyn Heath v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 21-2309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVELYN HEATH, CHIEF INSPECTOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Jeremy Barney v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-1597
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. KNAPP, Captain, GLASS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH BARNEY
Jeremy Pinson v. S. Valencick, et al
as 20-1947
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HEATH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY V. PINSON
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 20-2025
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID EBBERT, C. BENNETT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Soltanipour v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2019cv01968
Defendant:
Scott Beardsley, Loren McFarland, Scott Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Shahrokh Soltanipour
Nominal Defendant:
Inogen, Inc.
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 19-2338
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID EBBERT, J. GILLY, Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Sapphire Bay Condominium West v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds of London et.al.
as 3:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds of London, Thompson Heath and Bond, Ltd., Colin Probyn and others
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Bay Condominium West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mangiapane Jr.
as 1:2009cv00361
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pawel P. Dynkowski, Matthew W. Brown, Jacob Canceli and others
Petitioner:
Serina M Meagher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
LEBOWITZ v. HEATH
as 3:2018cv08552
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEBOWITZ
Defendant:
JOHN C. HEATH
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. Christopher Heath
as 17-3402
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARK HEATH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
