Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Hermione Winter v. Monica Mills, et al
as 19-1702
Defendant / Appellee:
SMANATHA GEORGE, C/O, COLLETTE, MA, MONICA MILLS, MA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMIONE KELLY IVY WINTER, formerly known as David Allen Allemandi
Marjorie Parise v. Daniel Van Pelt
as 19-1452
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHZAFERMAN LAKIND, TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE EGG HARBOR, SHAWN P. MCCARTHY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT PARISE and MARJORIE PARISE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BOHORQUEZ et al v. DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE et al
as 2:2017cv05075
Plaintiff:
DORIS BOHORQUEZ and RALPH FOUBISTER
Defendant:
MARIA LUISA DE MORENO PIRAQUIVE, CARLOS ALBERTO BAENA LOPEZ, ALEXANDRA MORENO PIRAQUIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LOJA et al v. MELLA et al
as 2:2016cv04251
Plaintiff:
LUIS PATRICIO NAULA LOJA , JOSE ANTONIO NAULA LOJA , LUZ VICTORIA CASTRO SUMBA and others
Defendant:
EPHRAIM TAHIR MELLA , THE LAW OFFICES OF TAHIR MELLA, P.C. , WANDA MELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Victor Santiago
as 16-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR SANTIAGO, a/k/a Nelson Antonio Serrano-Munoz
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07265
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , AF TAXI, INC. , AG TAXI, INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS KALANICK, JON FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
In re: Jorge Munoz
as 13-2825
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE L. MUNOZ
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
