Cases 21 - 30 of 36
In re: PennEast Pipeline Co LLC
as 19-1223
Defendant:
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO, WELLS FARGO BANK and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
In re: PENNEAST PIPELINE CO LLC
Undetermined:
NEW JERSEY STATE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
DAVIS v. FEIN SUCH KAHN & SHEPARD PC. et al
as 2:2018cv08560
Plaintiff:
SHARON DAVIS
Defendant:
FEIN SUCH KAHN & SHEPARD PC., US BANK TRUST NA, BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ginnine Fried v. JP Morgan Chase & Co, et al
as 16-3069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GINNINE FRIED
Defendant - Appellant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, DBA Chase
Ginnine Fried v. JP Morgan Chase & Co, et al
as 16-8034
Plaintiff - Respondent:
GINNINE FRIED
Defendant - Petitioner:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Albert and Carol Mueller Ltd P, et al v. Nigel King, et al
as 15-8028
Petitioner:
ALBERT AND CAROL MUELLER LTD PARTNERSHIP, ALBERT MUELLER, CAROL MUELLER and others
Respondent:
NIGEL KING, BRANDON LEWIS, TAYLOR TRISCHETTA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
