Cases 21 - 30 of 642
In re: Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 23-2412
Petitioner:
In re: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBVIE INC, ABBVIE PRODUCTS LLC and others
Respondent:
KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP and others
Soderberg v. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Soderberg
Defendant:
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cedric Francois, Federico Grossi and others
Johnson v. Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Robert Cobuzzi, Jr., Jane H. Hollingsworth and others
Thompson v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., William L. Ashton, Brittany K. Bradrick and others
Kent v. Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Samuel Agresta, David Beier and others
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P. and MYLAN INC.
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Ballard v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
In Re: Request from South Korea
as 1:2023mc00248
Petitioner:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Respondent:
Biogen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Gina Russomanno v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, et al
as 23-8013
Petitioner:
GINA RUSSOMANNO
Respondent:
SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC and IQVIA INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
