Cases 21 - 30 of 58
In re: Evaristo Serrano Vargas
as 18-2104
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Nominal Respondent:
MALACHY E. MANNION
OLIVANT et al v. VARGAS et al
as 2:2018mc00069
Movant:
CARLIE OLIVANT , BRENDA LOTT and GAIL SLOMINE
Respondent:
OMAR VARGAS, ROBERT BERTONE, MICHELLE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
VARGAS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04558
Plaintiff:
MARIA VARGAS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Evaristo Serrano Vargas v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2424
Petitioner:
EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS, AKA Evaristo Vargas-Serrano, AKA Desi Mata, AKA Mata Desi
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Manuel Soto-Vargas v. Attorney General USA
as 17-2206
Petitioner:
MANUEL SOTO-VARGAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Vargas-Argeta v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1866
Petitioner:
JOSE VLADIMIR VARGAS-ARGETA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VARGAS v. QUALMAX SUPPLIES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01826
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ALEJANDRO VARGAS
Defendant:
QUALMAX SUPPLIES, INC. , GLOBAL , GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL and others
Cross_claimant:
QUALMAX SUPPLIES, INC. , VESTIL MANUFACTURING CORP. , GLOBAL and others
Cross_defendant:
GLOBAL , GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL , VESTIL MANUFACTURING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leonard Vargas v. Attorney General United States
as 17-1405
Petitioner:
LEONARD VARGAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Elvio Perez Medina
as 15-3062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELVIO PEREZ MEDINA, a/k/a Giovanny Vargas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
