Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Moody v. GC Services LP et al
as 1:2014cv01766
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moody
Defendant:
GC Services LP, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES et al v. CRESCENT BANK & TRUST INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05205
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY JONES and BERNETTA JONES
Defendant:
CRESCENT BANK & TRUST INC. , C&S AUTO RECOVERY SERVICES INC., JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROWN v. PERFORMANT RECOVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03638
Plaintiff:
SARINA BROWN
Defendant:
PERFORMANT RECOVERY, INC., JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROTHERS MOTORSPORTS, LLC v. BURLINGTON CITY et al
as 1:2014cv03327
Plaintiff:
BROTHERS MOTORSPORTS, LLC
Defendant:
BURLINGTON CITY, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ATWOOD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07262
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ATWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARRAR v. MCNESBY et al
as 2:2013cv05683
Plaintiff:
NONA FARRAR
Defendant:
JOHN T. MCNESBY, PHILADELPHIA FOP LODGE #5, MAUREEN FAULKNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Grand Jury Matter
as 13-3871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and ABC CORP
BORENSTEIN MCCONNELL & CALPIN, P.C. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv03039
Plaintiff:
BORENSTEIN MCCONNELL & CALPIN, P.C.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION , JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cross_claimant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
BORENSTEIN MCCONNELL & CALPIN, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: Grand Jury
as 12-2878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 AND JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and ABC CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
