Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Lamar MaconIn re: Lamar Macon
as 19-2310
Not Yet Classified:
In re: LAMAR MACON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NOEL L. HILLMAN
Derrick King v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 19-2164
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O MATTHEW LUPPOLD and C/O KIESER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LAMAR KING
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and D.W. CHIEF SMITH, Deputy Warden
Lamar Trower v. Johnson & Johnson Co, et al
as 19-2154
Defendant / Appellee:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR ANTIONE TROWER
James Biggins v. Matt Denn, et al
as 19-2095
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KLINE, ROBERT COUPE, LEANN DUNN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MARTIN, Paralegal II, DANA METZGER, Warden, STANLEY BAYNARD, Internal Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Lamar Alford v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 19-1857
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR ALFORD
USA v. Alonzo Johnson
as 19-1289
Defendant / Appellant:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2018mc00672
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ARTHUR LAMAR ADAMS and MADISON TIMBER PROPERTIES, LLC
Receiver:
ALYSSON L. MILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2018mc00147
Defendant:
MADISON TIMBER PROPERTIES, LLC and ARTHUR LAMAR ADAMS
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Appointment of Receiver
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Adams et al
as 3:2018mc00401
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Lamar Adams and Madison Timber Properties, LLC
Receiver:
Alysson L Mills
Securites and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 1:2018mc00214
Plaintiff:
Securites and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Madison Timber Properties, LLC and Arthur Lamar Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
