Cases 31 - 40 of 123
ZHANG et al v. TING ORTHODONTIC LAB, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01334
Defendant:
TING ORTHODONTIC LAB, INC. and RICHARD TING
Plaintiff:
JUN ZHANG and JUN LI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Feng Li v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1097
Petitioner:
FENG YING LI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STROUGO v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03635
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C. CREW, LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and MARTIN P. GALVAN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STROUGO
Petitioner:
SOE WONG, SHOUFENG LI, MICHAEL HOELTZEL and others
LU v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01969
Plaintiff:
LI XIA LU
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 2023
RICKMAN et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04363
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (BMW A.G.), BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, ROBERT BOSCH LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY REISING, GARNER RICKMAN and ZIWEN LI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
AHUJA et al v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00846
Plaintiff:
BHARAT AHUJA , VALIANT INVESTMENT FUND, L.P. , JAMES OLIVER EMERSON and others
Defendant:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. , J. MICHAEL PEARSON, HOWARD B. SCHILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC et al v. LI
as 2:2017cv08296
Plaintiff:
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC and VIRTU AMERICAS LLC
Defendant:
MIN LI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Cheng Li v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1557
Petitioner:
CHENG XI LI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kozma v. Sieczkarek et al
as 1:2016cv01254
Plaintiff:
Liam Kozma
Defendant:
Mark M. Sieczkarek, Paul E. Freiman, Gail Maderis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
