Cases 31 - 40 of 349
WHITE v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2022cv04837
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. White
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, BERGEN COUNTY (NEW JERSEY), Baltimore County Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
WHITE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
LAKAYLAH WHITE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Mashaq White
as 22-2197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MASHAQ WHITE
GORLAMARI v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
KRANTHI GORLAMARI
Defendant:
VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TED WHITE, P. TERENCE KOHLER JR. and others
Carlisle v. The National Security Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
The National Security Group, Inc., Walter P. Wilkerson, Fred D. Clark, Jr. and others
USA v. Horace Henry
as 22-1464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HORACE HENRY, a/k/a Dale R. Morgan, a/k/a Sadekie White, a/k/a Metro, a/k/a Kevon Haynes
USA v. Namir White
as 22-1179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NAMIR WHITE, also known as NA
Thomas White, Jr., et al v. Samsung Electronics America In, et al
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THOMAS ROGER WHITE, JR. and PATRICIA CAULEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC
Defendant:
SONY ELECTRONICS INC
Marcus WhiteIn re: Marcus White
as 21-3309
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS WHITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ward v. Camden Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Carlet D. Ward
Defendant:
Camden Police Department, Town of Camden, Wayne White and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
